Claw - "Neom really, really, needs to respond"
Sorry, but I disagree with you. NEOM does not need to respond, in order to have the same reexamination appeal rights with the USPTO.
The EFF petition is a JOKE! Have you read it from beginning to end? I have, 3 times.
There are many legal issues in the EFF petition, which the USPTO, does not have the authority to address nor resolve.
Those legal issues are a JOKE, also. The court, a judge only, has the authority to address the legal issues. The USPTO addresses prior art, not legal issues.
NEOM does not need to get into a "public sensationalized pissing contest" with the EFF (as is what the EFF, IMO, wants in this case).
NEOM should not address the EFF's petition. NEOM will, IMO, address a wrongful decision by the USPTO, in an appeal. The EFF petition, IMO, will not be addressed by NEOM, as NEOM should not be out there defending the slander of the EFF!
Smart move, IMO, will not address the EFF's petition, and NEOM will not get into a "pissing contest" with the EFF!
Good to have you back! Some of us missed you!
All of you have a good day.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
