InvestorsHub Logo

SPIN

02/14/04 2:48 PM

#30140 RE: 24601 #30138

edit: no, 24, i was not citing you as a reference.

i was asking Doma to ask you for any future explanations on securities law as i don't wanna be obligated to explain it further. you would certainly be free to ignore any subsequent requests or even completely disagree w/my take.

i'm definitely not guessing that Wave is facing investigations from multiple fronts.

& as for what those investigations might produce, i have posted again & again that i literally have no idea. additionally, i have also posted that it remains possible that Wave will be found to have no culpability.

would you be willing to state that it is not a fact that Wave & certain of its principals are being investigated?

edit: awk, this entire spate began when you & Doma took issue w/my posting that it is a FACT that they are facing investogations. i have certainly not prematurely convicted them of anything & have repeatedly posted that they could eventually be exonerated & that they could settle all the class actions.

THAT is why i'm still here!!!