InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: 24601 post# 30138

Saturday, 02/14/2004 2:48:07 PM

Saturday, February 14, 2004 2:48:07 PM

Post# of 249131
edit: no, 24, i was not citing you as a reference.

i was asking Doma to ask you for any future explanations on securities law as i don't wanna be obligated to explain it further. you would certainly be free to ignore any subsequent requests or even completely disagree w/my take.

i'm definitely not guessing that Wave is facing investigations from multiple fronts.

& as for what those investigations might produce, i have posted again & again that i literally have no idea. additionally, i have also posted that it remains possible that Wave will be found to have no culpability.

would you be willing to state that it is not a fact that Wave & certain of its principals are being investigated?

edit: awk, this entire spate began when you & Doma took issue w/my posting that it is a FACT that they are facing investogations. i have certainly not prematurely convicted them of anything & have repeatedly posted that they could eventually be exonerated & that they could settle all the class actions.

THAT is why i'm still here!!!




Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.