Value, communication and speculation.
Latter one would not exist much if first two are clear and there.
Perhaps, the one good example we saw for Innova was when they announced the involvement of Ashcroft as advisor to the company and his group as our lobby firm. Yes, this was a real news but until/if really ever happens, it was only a speculation on basis of its contribution to value in future. What happened? Market (and, we all) welcomed the news then reality took its place, so no deliverable no value, equals to where things were before, first to 40s then back to 20s!
PaperProhet: “Companies need to execute on operations--that's where the value resides. PR'ing just to raise awareness of the stock is a no-value-added activity.”
This is what and only Innova management should do first and foremost then clearly & effectively communicate to the market.
For example; management has to show another significant increase over previous quarter to establish growth trend (was +37% last qtr) and consistency... management has to send strong and credible message how Coroware is important for Microsoft and its relative position in MSRS... management has to communicate what else is going on with Coroware besides Microsoft... management has to give some indication (periodically) how many robots Coroware sold... management has to give some idea what is in place for RWT licensing program for companies they are/will be pursuing, etc. etc. etc.
Rest is… manipulation, speculation, frustration, anger, lost hopes, etc.
Market does not like uncertainty. I think, this is where Innova management is best… consistently being successful in not being convincing and clear. In my opinion, this is the most important thing to turn people off.
Whether it is current or potential, if the value is made tangible and officially communicated -believe me- it does not take much for market to catch up even if a company/management does a lousy job getting the message into investment community.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
