InvestorsHub Logo

TEX

07/03/07 5:50 PM

#132 RE: lmbass #131

is misleading, agreed...but they get off the hook with this line near the end: "Furthermore, PAIM believes that since 2005 it has been a victim of naked short selling and applauds this latest action taken by the SEC, but is concerned that the new rules will not be vigorously enforced."

But then what does anybody expect from those characters?

michael_a_berenis

07/03/07 9:52 PM

#133 RE: lmbass #131

I think you are wrong. Regardless, PAIMP has its position here. It should be added, 14.2 Trillion to the list above. It is also not off topic. It is indeed a stock involved with the grandfather short clause removal! The company released it plain fact. I dont agree with your perspective and highlights.