InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

followinsnsr

06/25/07 4:30 PM

#78276 RE: risk_it_us #78273

Now that is a post with common sense.
Your right how would the Navy personal even know it was Globetel, they were not invited.
icon url

Design123

06/25/07 4:40 PM

#78277 RE: risk_it_us #78273

Below mentioned GTEM and Sanswire:

http://www.les.disa.mil/public/CWID2007/CWID-Trials-Quad-Charts-by-Objectives.ppt#525,62,IT 6.42 HotZone 4010/4020 (HZ4010)
icon url

nerd86

06/25/07 7:40 PM

#78284 RE: risk_it_us #78273

risk_it you can find some of the most irrelevent items to be concerned over. GlobeTel was attending the trials to protect their interests. The Navy may have been bamboozeled into thinking Trimax was the owner of the product. Whatever the issues might be it isn't with the product itself at the moment. We will all become aware at the summary of the outcome. Making up the outcome is hardly kosher.
icon url

cometoplay

06/26/07 8:00 AM

#78308 RE: risk_it_us #78273

Whats good for Trimax is good for Globetel.

Acording to the Agreement between Globetel and Altvater "If Altvater sells any of the Hotzone Product Line, Globtel shall receive 50% of the profit from such sale and Altvater shall receive the remaining 50% of profit from the sale."

http://investor.globetel.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=67726&p=irol-irhome