InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1757
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2006

Re: followinsnsr post# 78271

Monday, 06/25/2007 4:20:09 PM

Monday, June 25, 2007 4:20:09 PM

Post# of 157299
I'm still very perplexed by the cwid trials and globetel. The Navy did not approach globetel and ask them to participate. There's an application and acceptance of sponsership that a company must complete and if accepted is then allowed to participate, not the other way around as globetel pr'd

"GlobeTel was invited to CWID to demonstrate its proprietary HotZone 4000 Series in support of the Homeland Security side of the demonstration, for these specific objectives:"

The funny part to me is that Trimax Wireless is the one that submitted the application and was accepted by and sponsered by the Navy not Globetel, in fact globetel is never mentioned in the cwid trials overviews at all nor does it allude to a propietary product of globetels known as the hotzone 4010/4020 but rather says in the trial papers that it's a product of trimax wireless. I don't intend on getting into the discussion of who owns what again between trimax/globetel but obvious to me globetel has given up its rights to the hotzone 4000 series base stations and of course never had rights to the 6000 products by Trimax. The link below is the trial papers and specifically on page 23 you can view who is at the trials and who the Navy accepts as owners of the Hotzone products.

http://www.cwid.js.mil/public/CWID07Trials.pdf

IMO - Globetel just threw the CWID pr out as yet another fluffy prop.



Remember that overlypromotional and hype statements from individuals and companies are illegal. If you feel investors are being "rooked" contact the SEC.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.