InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

29tango

04/25/07 7:23 PM

#142945 RE: barge #142942

Barge,

You stated.

"Gokite--WAVE doesn't intend to compromise on the options issue, ergo a NO vote equals NO ADDITIONAL OPTIONS! Simple enough?"

BS. On the unlikely chance that the 500,000 options per is voted down, SKS an associates will compromise for a lower number. They simply want as much as they can get. There is no way in hell they will say if we can't have it all we don't want any.

Regards,

29tango
icon url

bbigtim

04/25/07 7:24 PM

#142946 RE: barge #142942

barge/Too Simple

I assure you that, if the present excessive options proposal is defeated, a more reasonable and modest options proposal will be prepared to supplant it, and a special meeting will be scheduled to consider it.

If the current proposal passes, a substantial no vote may serve to remind the board of its fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders, and thereby moderate the likelihood of any excessive options grants.
icon url

go-kitesurf

04/25/07 8:15 PM

#142965 RE: barge #142942

My vote is -NO- on both. EOM