InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

may1sep2

04/19/07 8:47 AM

#141553 RE: cygnuscap #141551

CYGNUSCAP, Why are you so suddenly concerned

about Wave Investors? How does it effect you?

Where have you been for the last ten years?
icon url

rachelelise

04/19/07 9:18 AM

#141561 RE: cygnuscap #141551

Cygnuscap

At first glance, I also would want to know a lot more about why the stock pool and stock grant guidelines should be tripled following the 3 to 1 reverse split. I assume there will be information provided to explain why this is being recommended by the Board. (And this is not a set up to say that they just want more).

As for your other comments, do you have some benchmarks as to Director pay (in its various forms) to support your comments. I don't dispute them since I don't have benchmark data but it is also not clear that they are way above market.

As for bonuses, I only thought that part of the bonus was essentially "non performance" and is in essence deferred pay (presumably not guaranteed). Clealry there is a better way to characterize it.

icon url

24601

04/19/07 10:48 AM

#141601 RE: cygnuscap #141551

I think you overestimate the percentages of their ownership interests by an order og magnitude. You seem to be ignoring the difference between common shares actually held, on one hand, and common shares "subject to options presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days," on the other.

On the basis of common shares actually held, the CEO currently owns less than 0.2% of the company.