SPIN: credibility and cliff
In my exchange with Larry Dudash I wrote a single sentence about you:
"SPIN seems to think Wave gets screwed under RAND licensing."
You write that that's an "outright lie" and that I'm "beyond the pale." That seems a bit shrill.
I was recalling your allusion to the TCG's RAND-licensing policy as "(seemingly) equitable" and your statement as follows:
"IMO a bigger concern is that w/RAND, other TPM players could catch up while the market ramps & it may be in a Gorilla's (or three) best interest to stall deployment for a Q or 2 to allow their R&D to close the gap & permit them to establish rival offerings."
If I read that passage incorrectly, I apologize. I admit that I have a little trouble with your style of presentation.
Best wishes,
John