InvestorsHub Logo

siriuslyricher

03/19/07 1:37 PM

#68387 RE: rhlytle #68386

I respectfully disagree. Alexis Shapiro is reputed to be a very good lawyer. If she stated that she believes the plaintiffs' written argument was ridiculous (and knowing what I do about the case and the relevant law), this is a very good sign for the defendants.

ineedtoknow

03/19/07 2:09 PM

#68388 RE: rhlytle #68386

The Plaintifs would need to have a witness from the Russia Company. Do you really think they will come to the US? The Attorneys would need to dispose them first, but first you would have to find them.

nerd86

03/19/07 3:07 PM

#68399 RE: rhlytle #68386

rhlytle first there is a finding of the presented by the Plaintif is filed under the proper law governing the action requested or a similar finding of governing law. The will yield a summary judgement against the suit without prejudice, meaning they can refile the suit based upon the direction of the court for a rehearing. Then there is the finding that the Plaintif does not offer sufficient evidence, acceptable to the Court, that justifies their claim. This will yield a Summary judgement against the suit with prejudice, which means the Plaintifs can appeal the decision, but essentially the case is over. Finally the Court can decide that there is sufficient evidence to support the Plaintifs claim and the suit will be allowed to be heard in court. There is no discussion of the possibility fo the suit being successful in any of the decisions.