Replies to post #138683 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[zen 88]

tampa- You mistake my meaning.

Guess I should have said 'bashers', then you surely wouldn't have thought I was including you in the category. I wasn't, or anyone like you.

At the same time, I don't see you making a case of why Wave won't succeed, so again, you fall outside the category. Listen, I have been just as outspoken as you have over the years, and have sent many a pointed email to Wave. The Machievellian nature of this management is a fact of life that I've come to accept, but the end DAMN WELL better justify the means that have driven us all to distraction once or twice.

Wish you well.

[Snackman]

Tampa, you said: on this board, anyone who has lost patience, and says so with any regularity seems to be "sometimes unfairly" labeled as a naysayer.

This is totally untrue. I am sick and tired of those of you that accuse this board of censorship and not letting anyone one post a negative post. That is BS. Your post is still standing isn't it?

Check on BNE's (who did himself in by Matt) posts and Kev to name a couple.

Your are way out of line and this discussion is over because it has nothing to do with what we are talking about on this board.