InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

manibiotech

06/29/24 7:58 PM

#702431 RE: Reefrad #702429

I think you are putting too much focus on 150 day thing . In original PR they said they applied to be considered in 150 day pathway . I believe one of later filing said that they on track for faster approval . But even they knew what stage they are in , you still can’t rely on 150 or 210 days cutoff as MHRA is not bound by it and historically take much longer than that on average . So only thing they could have told you is if they received RFI or not , which if they did and was not something unexpected then they don’t need to share . Otherwise it will happen when MHRA gets to it .
icon url

JTORENCE

06/29/24 8:06 PM

#702432 RE: Reefrad #702429

Reefrad Really, so W-T-F else is new with LP;
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

FeMike

06/29/24 8:11 PM

#702437 RE: Reefrad #702429

On the other hand she did say they believe they are in the 150 day path so there were contradictions in what she was saying. Her use of future tense implied what you are saying but the 150 days and the bit about not commenting what stage they were in suggests otherwise.



You can be in the 150 day review and still be behind schedule. The MHRA has delays and backlogs. The 150 day is a target, a goal, not a guarantee. She can both believe they are in the 150 day review and not have received an RFI yet because the MHRA is so far behind schedule.