Have you seen a copy of the NDA - there were never any NDA's you can't be that naive.
It is an old pumpers trick - to post about something great but the company signed a NDA. LMAO!
Don't be so childish with post like this:
"FU little boy, try proving there never was an NDA. You don't know business for squat, and while this 'may' be a scam, it's obvious you'll never be the one to first know it."
I can't believe so many fell for the old NDA pumping trick.
If you believed that then you don't know anything about business or OTC investing.
On exchange traded stocks the SEC doesn't like them.
"the SEC has adopted an almost-identical rule. Restrictive NDAs (in and of themselves) are considered a securities law violation — just like insider trading. Therefore, companies that engage in these illegal practices are subject to severe sanctions."
The SEC demands transparency - there is zero transparency in ENZC.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
