InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sspalmo

06/10/24 9:59 PM

#198489 RE: docsetc #198487

Neither are a subsidiary of Enzolytics, nor are they subs of any other company. I understand the need for these new corporations. To pretend they were subsidiaries is misleading.
"why did CC leave and to create a sub for himself and not a part of ENZC in the first place?"
It's the same as pretending that the problems between the two management teams started with the formation of the subs BGEN and VIRO.
"The rift between management goes back a long time, apparently. It culminated in the formation of the two subsidiaries."
Those subs started when BioClonetics and Enzolytics merged. If the problems started when they were merging, then in my opinion they should have split at that time and not proceeded with the merger.
The CCC team has a long uphill battle to win back shareholder confidence of myself and I'm guessing some others.
icon url

I-Glow

06/11/24 11:35 AM

#198504 RE: docsetc #198487

Chandra is another conman - he hasn't developed anything AI.

There are 2 patents and they are worthless - they are from 2007 and 2011 neither have been monetized.

A drug patent is meaningless without FDA approved clinical trials.

Has Chandra applied for a patent for his AI?

ENZC is a Zombie ticker.

IG