InvestorsHub Logo

dennisdave

05/13/24 4:53 PM

#691192 RE: flipper44 #691191

Flipper did you read my post. Now you are trying to change the subject trying to explain to me what a request for info is which I btw apparently know better than you,

Les said NO news is GOOD news. RFI good or bad IS news. Therefore Les is saying they did not receive an RFI for that would be news.
But you turned that somehow into AN DOUBLE RFI. Seriously?

DrHigh

05/13/24 4:54 PM

#691193 RE: flipper44 #691191

to think a 1.7mm+ page application would not entail a request for more information is comical. I think there is a 95% chance we got one and it would still be a success if we get approval by Fall. fingers crossed that our cap markets strategy between now and then do not bury us.

dennisdave

05/13/24 5:10 PM

#691208 RE: flipper44 #691191

I simply calculated that they must have asked for an additional 60 days to respond in addition to the 60 days they would have been given if they received an RFI

The RFI which they received when according to Les, they received no news. Makes perfect sense.

Im going to order a Nothing Burger now. With no salad, no ketchup, no unions, no pickles and no meat. Yummie

hankmanhub

05/14/24 12:57 AM

#691315 RE: flipper44 #691191

Flipper, I think what is more likely is given that the MAA submission was extremely large (1.7 Mil) and therefore the first phase of the MHRA analysis took longer than the normal time, and there was only one RFI without NWBO asking for an extension, and this can still be called "on the 150 day track" even though it took the MHRA a little longer to do the analysis. So everything is going well as per Les om Biz