Replies to post #691164 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[norisknorewards]

" I still believe that this week is still in play."

⛔️STOP STOP STOP⛔️

[Nemesis18]

It’s as if the Management is deliberately tanking the stock now, to bankrupt it, so that they can walk away liability free as Directors when it goes bankrupt and is cut lose

[NotSure2]

No they did not announce that there was no RFI. Lee never said something about no RFI.

It is people's false interpretation... (which hurt this stock real bad, more than the FUD obvious fud post).

1: Not because there was no change or addition to the submission that it means no RFI. An RFI doesnt change a submission, they are 2 different thing.

2: If no news, it doesnt mean no RFI. RFI doesnt equal "bad news". NWBO said it themselves, they expect an RFI. They expect a Fall approval.

All good, we are getting there.

- Last year I had to argue over and over that NWBO didnt submit aplication, they would have PR'ed it. (who was right?)

- I had to argue that validation of application was going to be between 20 Jan - 2 Feb based on info available from Hoffman. So many people interpreted that info for validation would happen within 7 days... (who was right?)

- Had to argue that aproval will not happen before May, (who was right?)

Damn, how many times people can be wrong, for others to realize that these always wrong are full of shit. Time to listen to what NWBO is telling us, instead of fabricating stories.

"Approval in a few miliseconds" over and over and over... Please stop with the non stop worng interpretations.

[flipper44]

They never stated there was no RFI. What they previously stated, in my own words, is that their MAA was validated, passed validation and confirmed validated. They never needed to modify the MAA after submission to get confirmed validated.

Gary, any phase I RFI would have come after the MAA was confirmed validated.

The only way what Les said makes sense, imho, is that this moves to fall because NWBO asked for an extra 60 days on top of the 60 days they already had to respond. Les said as of May 9, there is no bad news to report.

In other words for him to say the 150 day accelerated is on track, he is allowed to discount the additional 120 days that are not counted on the 150 day clock.

That’s why Les can say it’s still accelerated and on track.

[dstock07734]

Gary,

I cannot get it why people talk about no RFI all the time. I never anticipated there would be one. The significance of the following unpublished paper was completely neglected. See the paper written by NCI researchers in which they defined OS greater than 3 years as the long term survival while they did the analysis for the p3 trial solely run by NWBO they defined OS greater than 5 years as the long term survival survival. Obviously they used a higher-bar criteria to evaluate the p3 trial. Plus by now over one thousand GBM patients most likely received the treatment. How could there be RFI?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE249282