InvestorsHub Logo

G420

05/08/24 10:47 PM

#344922 RE: Stock_Barber #344919

Looks like we’re hitting a nerve here! You fools can’t shut up about about how Kramer has nothing to do with ANYTHING!!!

Would never/could never/never ever ever!!!!!

Are we close? I think so!!

johnydollar

05/08/24 11:57 PM

#344928 RE: Stock_Barber #344919

Wow!
Looks like they are painting a rosy picture of the good kramers.......

Ain't that beautiful........

Poor kramers........

It's not their fault.......

The companies force them to a life of crime.........

Oh well........

Poo28

05/09/24 12:35 PM

#344973 RE: Stock_Barber #344919

BUBE posting the Kramer PR? Wonder if got advance copy? What Company has their attorneys do the PR on their letterhead. Very odd, arms length. Yet attorneys and all Kramer Companies have the same address. Only Outlier is most recent  one in Virginia.  Best you reserve opinions, or just like revocation opinions which were wrong . The law has evolved and the broker-dealer interpretation is evolving case law.

Shareholders noted in Tuesday’s PR that the case I have been posting for years to counter the unauthorized PR that Kramer fraudulently released. CK motioned to get a turnover order to steal DBMM/Digital Clarity which was fraudulent because  he signed a Consent Decree 2 days earlier! The case was Hope Capital and it is footnoted on pg  4 of the most recent Complaint. Karma sounds like , not your “2 sides  to  any story.”

Suggest you look up the definition of the word recidivism and recidivist from yesterday’s SEC complaint.

https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239-s.pdf

https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239.pdf

"The SEC’s order finds that Kramer and Hope Capital violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.  Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Kramer and Hope Capital consented to the entry of a cease and desist order, to a prohibition from acquiring any security from any affiliate of an issuer of securities, and to pay disgorgement of $525,603, plus prejudgment interest of $54,144.  Kramer also agreed to pay a civil penalty of $100,000." 

Likewise try and understand the current interpretation of broker-dealer and lending money just to get shares makes.  CK a broker dealer without the requisite licenses that are required.

The NSS is separate and apart and suggest you haven’t a clue nor is there  the “ evidence” bashers demand. Until there is. iMO Suggest you let regulators do their job and sequence as they see fit. Conflating as you do not effective. Silence by bystanders is.

Case law and Key phrase: It is legal until it isn’t.

DBMM long and strong. Just like wins,  patience always works when documentation in place.