Replies to post #82883 on SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[mahatmapaul]

thanks Kool

I don't know this Jake, but it he fits the profile of an angry-at-basher-shorters-true-believer, he's going to get laughed at if he starts talking about shorting OTC pinkies.

What's interesting is that while there have been numerous instances of pumpers being prosecuted (and even imprisoned) for intentional pump and dumps, as well as true-professional-bashers being prosecuted, there have been apparently zero instances of anyone prosecuted for "bashing" otc pinky stocks. I think the reason is simply that to be prosecuted for bashing, the plaintiff would have to show damages (bashers can and do damage higher priced stocks through shorting), but the total absence of any prosecution of otc-pinky "bashers" is because there can be no shorting of penny stocks, and that obviates claims of damages.

[surfkast]

Nice DD. Janice advised me of where that came from but you were first to post. Just goes to show how afraid the pumping idiots are! And how stupid they are . Again, does anyone with 1/2 of a brain cell think Park would want discovery?

[Diamondhands45]

Incorrect. Ihub can be compelled to provide identifying information when you have an attorney and can show cause. I know because I know people who have done it.

Next farce please

[learningthetruth]

"It has nothing whatsoever to do with SPZI other that one member on that list is active here."

Yes, IGLOW.........But YOU and MANY HERE will be on the SPZI Defamation List......Coming Soon IMHO.......

Just giving you a "heads up".......