Just 2 or 3 days ago, SAGA issued a PR stating that BGEN was out of the deal and was returned to ENZC with its IP, patent applications and some work in progress and even put a value on BGEN of $160 million.
Now, you and Dyno are saying CC and Chandra somehow stripped the IP and AI out of BGEN without giving compensation to either BGEN or ENZC, which spent millions over the last 3 years developing the IP and AI and made numerous representations that it all belonged to ENZC, even after attaching the 2022 and 2023 executed assignments of the patent applications from them (CC, JC and Chandra) to BGEN only 6 months ago in the BCA.
If they did this, I suspect there might be some significant legal issues associated with that act. Don't you? Is this just your speculation, is it inside information or is it something you've picked up from some source you think is reliable? I want to know.
I'm not saying it can't be done, eg, BGEN can miss on the terms of the assignments, but then there can be issues of right of ownership since they were employees of ENZC and ENZC foot the bills. Or maybe there was some agreement between them and Harry, in which case I would think all of them would have a legal problem, maybe with a lot of us.
So, which is true? I'd like to know more. All JMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
