Monday, April 29, 2024 12:29:30 AM
Now, you and Dyno are saying CC and Chandra somehow stripped the IP and AI out of BGEN without giving compensation to either BGEN or ENZC, which spent millions over the last 3 years developing the IP and AI and made numerous representations that it all belonged to ENZC, even after attaching the 2022 and 2023 executed assignments of the patent applications from them (CC, JC and Chandra) to BGEN only 6 months ago in the BCA.
If they did this, I suspect there might be some significant legal issues associated with that act. Don't you? Is this just your speculation, is it inside information or is it something you've picked up from some source you think is reliable? I want to know.
I'm not saying it can't be done, eg, BGEN can miss on the terms of the assignments, but then there can be issues of right of ownership since they were employees of ENZC and ENZC foot the bills. Or maybe there was some agreement between them and Harry, in which case I would think all of them would have a legal problem, maybe with a lot of us.
So, which is true? I'd like to know more. All JMHO.
Recent ENZC News
- Small Cap Recipient of Military Drone Technology • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 11/20/2023 01:14:45 PM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. enter Strategic Partnership to Commercialize Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology • BLO • May 16, 2024 8:13 AM
Avant Technologies to Revolutionize Data Center Management with Proprietary AI Software Platform • AVAI • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM