Replies to post #188016 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[LOVELWLG]

I think if you would sign 10 sardine deals it would start to attract some whale deals. If those 10 sardine deals using our perk started producing world class devices and generating huge revenue it would definitely get the whales attention to jump on board. Just think people have to stop accepting and start question his excuses. Just because he smiles after an excuse doesn't make it accurate.

[Scope08]

You should probably stop speaking. Your ignorance is showing.
Say something….backtrack… say something….backtrack. The “Nrdc two-step”

walterc put you in your place not long ago. You should stay there.

Hint….no one here values your insight, or “experience”.

Not trying to be mean, but you just continue to compound the embarrassment with each post.

[Reanimator]

Agree. Imagine how simple it would be for Lebby to provide a straightfroward answer to a reasonable shareholder question such as:

"OK, you've said that customers have asked for more reliability data. How much reliability data have you already provided them, and based on that, how long will it take to provide the remaning data they're requesting?"

The fact that Lebby refuses to answer these types of straightforward questions speaks volumes, unfortunately, about LWLG's commercialization efforts.

[Lurker3]

Every entrepeneur will rather have a fast buck then a slow ten dollar bill.

[tedpeele]

NRDC2's "MYSTERY", SATIRE, TRAINWRECK, & KCC's BLAST FROM THE PAST:

SATIRE: First, let's lighten the mood:

Lebby to Marcelli before Antwerk: "Hey Jim what can I tell the to keep them excited? I've been trying to let them know this it taking longer but I don't want to face an angry crowd"

Marcelli: "Just say Tier1 a whole bunch of times and let them know we have talked with -- I'm mean are working with - them and totally focused on that. That should hold them over."

Lebby: "But what if someone brings up the bonus miss last year and whether it is an even bigger tell than my 6 months guidance?"

Marcelli: "Damn it, I still can't believe Bucci and Leonberger did that after all we did for them in 2021!. Busts my chops -- THE FCKRS! Don't worry Michael. Just keep saying Tier1 and don't forget to smile and put up the jigglies. You work on the gang there and I'll work on the gang here..saw a beaut in Malibu and I gots to have it! "


Next, Nrdc2's mystery. Nrdc2, you wrote:

I am willing to say that he is intentionally evasive, obtuse, and misleading in order to maintain a certain level of shareholder belief/excitement. (That’s probably because he believes himself; but that’s irrelevant.)

and

Why he can’t or is unwilling to answer a very critical and straightforward question asked by an important investor who has brought in other significant investors is a very disturbing mystery

I think you are being too kind. To me there is no mystery at all: If there is no shareholder excitement, LPC stops funding, they can't pay their employees, they can't pay themselves, and they can't keep trying to do the nearly impossible. LPC isn't funding for fun, you know: they MUST make a profit by selling into the marketplace every time they get more shares. If they don't, it's game over. Dr Lebby knows this. It has to be a constant concern of his. That to me is the most likely reason he continues to mislead shareholders and to avoid the hard questions: If he came right out at ASM 2021, ASM 2022, ASM 2023, and Antwerp 2024 to directly say exactly where things really stood, the share price would be back under $1. He KNOWS this so he keeps the charade going.


The Trainwreck: The reasons are numerous, as my posts have overwhelmingly proven:

But to simplify, the new theme is Dr Lebby is in excuses mode - doing his best to tow the line between keeping investors believing while lowering expectations for a deal by ASM. The price since Antwerp - new lows at high volume while the Nasdaq is on fire - shows the market understands and no longer really knows what to expect. Nothing in an email from Antwerp answers the basic simple questions - if they did it would have to be in a PR or filing..

Nvidia using 8x100, Marvel 200x4, and OpenLight nearing 400Gpbs per lane, with little sign any of them about working with Lightwave Logic ("discussions" about polymers hardly counts) - and there is increased concern that the company is once again missing out to what other - and far bigger entities are already doing.

50 reasons: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174219171
33 questions: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174232127
Yesterdays summary: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174288371

I've tried to help people - especially the newcomers see the truth about Lightwave. For those already knee-deep, I wish you the best. Oh, the love...it truly is a Ring of Fire:

Il'l give Marco a break today. He may need a good nights sleep.


KCC's historical find: yesterday he posted a blast from the past. So long ago, I had nearly forgotten.

A board with an avg of 1 post every 2 days, hardly was my 'pride and joy' as he described it.

But I note the criteria I set for finding homerun plays. Lightwave just doesn't seem to fit:

CRITERIA
1. Must be fully reporting with the SEC. No pink sheets or companies just on foreign exchanges.
2. Must have a real product or technology. Credibility is critical. No shells or scams.
3. Cannot have significant floorless or other toxic financing. Watch that dilution!
4. A reasonable pathway to profitability within a year or two. Pay attention to overall debt, market potential, gross margin potential, and operating cash flow.
5. Market cap under $50 million. This limit is substantially lower than on the Kitchen, which can go up to $500 million.
6. Avoid generic sector plays without demonstrable revenue growth.
7. Avoid stocks highly dependant on factors outside of their control or a long ways off from commercialization--ie early phase biotechs, mining and exploration companies, unless they have REAL evidence which makes you expect results fairly soon.

#2 speaks for itself. NOTE that this WAS a homerun back in 2021 when the company made it sound like they met all of the above criteria, and they REALLY did have a market cap closer to $50m - 70m shares and started the year around $1 a share...so THAT was a good time to buy alright - given the clear implication of "massive" commercialization that year during his now infamous ASM presentation.

Now? Not so much: $450m market cap of a pre-revenue company is STILL almost unheard of - high...not very appealing, and at this point my interest has waned so much from the imo intentionally misleading messaging and the lack of verification that I'm mainly just hanging around to see if I've been right to trust my analysis or not..

Good Luck, and for any Newcomers reading this - check it all out both good AND bad before making a decision.

disclaimer: all my opinion based on my interpretation of reality