InvestorsHub Logo

boston745

04/18/24 12:11 AM

#85810 RE: georgejjl #85809

Carbon is not what is causing climate change. Its not even close to the main greenhouse gas. Whats causing warming is the weakening of the earths magnetic field which allows more radiation (solar and cosmic) into the atmosphere and to the surface (this increase in radiation is causing the melting at the poles). This increases earths energy budget more than anything else. Also that increased radiation causes increased evaporation which causes increased moisture in the atmosphere and is why the ground is drying faster. Increased evaporation causes increased moisture in the lower atmosphere. Creating a thermal blanket.
Unfortunately, while the lower atmosphere has been warming the upper atmosphere is cooling because the chaotic magnetic field shoots out into space bringing with it plasma from the upper atmosphere. The plasma goes out into space and loses energy. When the magnetic field reconnects the plasma comes back into the upper atmosphere its cooler causing the cooling being observed. Dr Solis' paper covers all this.
Tesla cannot stop this. Nothing can. Meanwhile Teslas cause more pollution to be released into the environment because of how quickly they go through tires. Tires being a bigger cause of pollution compared to tailpipe emissions.

The Upper Atmosphere Is Cooling, Prompting New Climate Concerns
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172052469

Meanwhile, EVs pollute more and cost more due to excessive tire wear. Consider having to replace your tires 1-2 times a year instead once every 5 years or so.

========================================

Electric vehicles release more toxic emissions, are worse for the environment than gas-powered cars: study

Electric vehicles release more toxic particles into the atmosphere and are worse for the environment than their gas-powered counterparts, according to a resurfaced study.

The study, published by emissions data firm Emission Analytics, was released in 2022 but has attracted a wave of attention this week after being cited in a Wall Street Journal op-ed Sunday.

It found that brakes and tires on EVs release 1,850 times more particle pollution compared to modern tailpipes, which have “efficient” exhaust filters, bringing gas-powered vehicles’ emissions to new lows.

Today, most vehicle-related pollution comes from tire wear.


Electric vehicles are often heavier than regular gas-powered cars due to the weight of their engines, which can reach 1,850 pounds. The heavier engines place extra weight on the tires and cause them to wear out faster, according to the study. A 1,100-pound engine can cause more than 400 times the emissions as direct exhaust emissions.
Particle pollution from tires is the biggest contributor to vehicle-related emissions.


I have a hard time believing its simply weight that causes EVs to go through tires at, sometimes, an excessive pace. They are not that much heavier to cause the vehicles to go through tires in as little as 5k miles. My guess is it has something to do with the EM radiation that comes off EVs coupled with the metal wire mesh in the tires that also created EM fields.

“But you have this downside of EVs that increases particle pollution. Air pollution is about what we breathe and the health effects,” Molden said, assuring that the toxins in tires have much less impact on climate change than they do on “what we eat and are ingesting.”

Increased exposure to these toxins “can increase the risk of health problems like heart disease, asthma, and low birth weight,” according to the New York Department of Health, which noted that pollution from sources including vehicle exhaust can travel long distances from its source and still cause health issues at unhealthy levels.

“A lot of it [chemicals] goes into the soil and water, affecting animals and fish. And we then go and eat the animals and fish, so we are ingesting tire pollution,” Molden added.



New tires every 7,000 miles? Electric cars save gas but tire wear shocks some Florida drivers

But after less than 5,000 miles of driving around his Boca Raton neighborhood, Semel was shocked to find some essential — and very expensive — parts were already wearing out. The tires. “If somebody looked at me and said, Mr. Semel, you are going to love this car but in about 7,000 miles you will have to pay 1,400 or 1,500 dollars to replace the tires, I wouldn’t have bought the car,” Semel said. For many drivers of EVs in Florida — the nation’s second largest market for electrical vehicles — premature tire wear has become an unexpected black mark on vehicles promoted as a green climate-friendly option to gas-gulping cars.



At EV Garage Miami, a Sweetwater repair shop that services 90 percent electric vehicles, lead technician Jonathan Sanchez said tires are the most frequent thing customers come in about — no matter what model or make of EV they’re driving. Tire mileage can vary widely of course, but he said he frequently changes EV tires at just 8,000 to 10,000 miles — a fourth or even fifth of typical tire wear on a gas-burning car.



Not even better for the environment. The level of the con game associated with Tesla is crazy.

Quote Sources:
https://nypost.com/2024/03/05/business/evs-release-more-toxic-emissions-are-worse-for-the-environment-study/
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/environment/climate-change/article284533695.html

crudeoil24

04/20/24 9:24 AM

#85849 RE: georgejjl #85809

Actually our sun is the largest cause CO2 in the atmosphere around the globe . Over the centuries the amount is cyclical. Quite a few scientists at MIT and Ivy League Universities as well as other industrial research scientists are coming to the same conclusions.

boston745

04/20/24 9:37 PM

#85857 RE: georgejjl #85809

We do need to move to other types of energy generation like geothermal which produces baseline power and heat for heating/cooling purposes. Fixed bed nuclear is another with water being a byproduct, but that tech is still early stages of R&D. Both of those will do more to help reduce pollutants than anything else. NO NEED FOR TOXIC BATTERIES!

We dont need EVs and we dont need solar & wind for anything other than to fill the gaps on power generation. At least for the power grid.