He has a claim in his disclaimer field that his missions is to expose scams. That appears to be a lie plain and simple because:
He brings up information about Walthers 15 years and 10 years ago that have no bearing of what is trying to be done today. He makes comparison of 4th quarter earning to 1st quarter earning for a company that is a seasonal business and ignores 1st quarter to 1st quarter comparison which is the common practice in SEC filings.to track a companies development, He post a court document that clearly shows the plaintiff lying about the protect-ability of the trade secret yet ignores because it doesn't cast the company in a negative light. He continues to ignore the effect the Adelstein court ruling had over the company for all those years while stressing the inactivity and lack of revenue the company had over those years under that ruling to help paint the company in a negative light. He ignores the company progress since the Adelstein settlement progress, while is not earth shattering it is progress because again it does put the company in negative light, He belittles the testimony of those that use the product, who see the real life results from using those products because it does not put the company in a negative light. He ignores the fact that the company satisfied the judgment and paid off all the property back taxes since the satisfying the settlement because it does not put the company in a negative light.
He not looking for truth about the company being a scam, he is contributing to the lie that it is.
Myself on the other hand will say very clearly Like all small companies the chance of success is rare the risk to loses every thing is very high. I don't talk about numbers because I don't have to, I trust the intelligence of each potential investor to see for themselves very easily in the PUBLIC DOCUMENTS what the numbers are, and can make their own decision if the risk is worth the chance of the reward.
I have no idea if IFUS will or will not make, what I do know is that the former uses of the product believe in the product so much they used their own time and money to save the company. It had nothing to do with Walther or Rhonda, but the shareholders themselves.