Replies to post #77751 on Impact Fusion International Inc (IFUS)

[tdbowieknife]

What they are saying is that the supposed "trade secret" they are accused of "stealing" is not a secret because everybody already knows about it and has known about it They also say it is commonly used in the feed industry. It's nothing new.

I believe the settlement they came too was that IFUS would call it (Nutri-Mastic) and that Absorbezz LLC, would call it Absorbezz


Geeezzz....


So much twisting.



.

Buyer Beware



..


..

[Ecomike]

I do believe they had already filed / submitted that patent application for Absorbezz in late 2013, including the required sworn statements to the US Patent office, claiming (before the 2016 IFUS counter suit was filed against those two and Absorbezz):

1) It had not been introduced into commerce prior to filing the patent application.
2) That it was new and novel. Those are legal requirements and forms that must be included and signed in sworn testimony, included in the patent applications.

If 1 & 2, were not acts of perjury, aka lies, why did they even claim in the defenses you shared in the post I am replying to from that 2016 court case that it was not patent-able?

If 1 & 2 were true, then the Absorbezz patent application was not for the IFUS product, but they did not claim that in the IFUS Counter suit testimony you posted today in the post I am replying to?

PantherJ claimed here for ages, years, that the Absorbezz patent was for the IFUS Nutri-Mastic (tm). Only problem with that, is that if it was,
it was not patent-able, because it had been introduced into commerce and sold for years, thus the application for the Absorbezz patent would have been mail fraud and patent fraud?

If it was the IFUS formula, The Boot Brothers should have known that, and thus it would have been Patent fraud and Mail fraud for filing and claiming it was new and novel, and had never been sold before, since they claimed in the 2016 court case that they did not believe it was patent-able?

It can not be both!!!

Since we know from the Absorbezz University trials that the University claimed that the Absorbezz was worse than a placebo, and we know that IFUS SGP+(tm) works, undeniably, Uber-Credibly well, we thus know they are obviously different products.