Replies to post #672020 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[biosectinvestor]

When you get compensation in shares, you have taxes. There was an allocation and a lawsuit. I doubt there is any secret involved here. And, by the way, you can sell shares to pay taxes even if they are not from the allocation. But I believe his taxes are related to his shares from the company.

Again, you’re not saying anything for real, just implying things.

[theorysuit]

Some links. Read this first article you can clearly see LP and toucan mentioned in too. So she was around when he was an analyst. Don't let these pumpers threaten or stop you from doing your own DD.

https://www.ft.com/content/8c0d0414-2f19-11dc-b9b7-0000779fd2ac

By Salamander Davoudi JULY 10 2007
Print this page
Shares in Northwest Biotherapeutics, which jumped 34 per cent on Monday after the company said it had received approval for its brain cancer vaccine in Switzerland, leapt another 54 per cent on Tuesday.

“This company has transformed the prospects for brain cancer patients overnight,” said Navid Malik, analyst at Collins Stewart, Northwest’s house broker. “DCVax will be available to European citizens in months.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/suspended-analyst-malik-leaves-cenkos-v7xq3hj5r0l

Navid Malik, an analyst at Cenkos Securities who was suspended, with pay, a few days ago while the firm explored a claim that Malik had received $5 million in Northwest stock after putting out a "bullish" report on its prospects. Malik is now a nonexecutive director at Northwest

[norisknorewards]

Biggest tidal wave of bs this side of the Mississippi

Embarrassing yourself

[kabunushi]

LOL. Pissant investor to BoD member: you need to open your personal financial books to the public because I assert that you might have been loaning your millions of shares to brokers for short sales for the interest $ you could have gotten. I'm just guessing you are a pissant alphapup, because nobody who really knows anything about investing would make such a ridiculous claim based on nothing other than "well he has X shares (btw you don't know how many are directly own shares and how many are warrants do you? If you think you do please explain how you know that [some MB dude said] so is the extent of your DD on this number, right? If not please explain how you documented it).

"With X shares he could have gotten Y dollars in interest payments if he loan his shares for Z length of time" - (btw please share your math on that too, nobody has any idea if your math even makes a tiny bit of sense). He sold $X worth of shares for a tax bill and we don't know what else he owns but he didn't sell any NWBO shares so OMG!!! maybe he had a tax bill for loaning his NWBO shares! So he has to disclose to the public what his tax bill was for. No dude, it doesn't work that way. This whole thing is you spouting random nonsense with nothing non-random to base your claim on.

I'm sorry to have to say this but you are full of shit. Like a BoD member is going to help the shorts by getting a few dollars to loan them his shares to short. Like anybody owes you any explanation to answer to a theory you pulled out of your ass based on pure wild ass speculation. Look, even if you're numbers are indeed reasonable which I seriously doubt you are totally nuts if you think that makes a case for trashing the guy let alone "demanding" that he prove to you that your wild-add and slanderous (I'm not saying that in the legal sense) guess is wrong

[CherryTree1]

If he received something like Restricted Stock Units then there isn't any immediate tax liability. You only have to pay taxes when your RSU vests and you receive an actual payout of stock shares. At that point, you have to report income based on the fair market value of the stock.