So Smitty if the share place has been beaten down, because of insiders loaning their enormous number of shares that are shorted? That’s irrelevant so the losses to the stock are related to that and not spoofing? That spoofing really didn’t cause the reduction in the price of the stock? so that’s irrelevant according to you. Isn’t one of the items of the lawsuit to figure out how much was lost by the activity? Please advise.