InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

exwannabe

01/30/24 4:01 PM

#668734 RE: Doc logic #668732

I felt like March might be the time for NWBO to announce an ASM based on progress with submission by that time but if still in progress they may be advised to avoid a meeting and any possibility of saying something they shouldn’t.


WOW. So now US public companies should violate the law based on somebody possibly saying something wrong.

This is so pathetic it is a joke. Even worse than your assertions they were right to lie about trial status for years because if they did not they could not get retail to buy in.

Why not just say they should cancel shares and run the company as private to insure no interference?
icon url

meirluc

01/30/24 9:13 PM

#668786 RE: Doc logic #668732

I believe Doc logic that you may have been right when you wrote
that EDENS may have been a part of the MAA submission to the MHRA.
This is also my guess and is based on LP's statements made on October 13
2023 in which she discussed the delay in the submission. She told us that
after overcoming an unexpected delay, the MAA submission could soon be finalized.
Maybe the unexpected delay was based on the assumption a few months earlier
that the EDEN manufacturing protocol was already up to par and could be included
in the submission but thereafter they found out that it was not yet ready, hence the delay.
Then unexpectedly they overcame that problem during a relatively short time with the
result that the EDEN manufacturing protocol was included in the MAA.

Perhaps LP's quote below emphasizes that it was important to submit a full strength
MAA to the MHRA (including EDEN?) because NWBO planned to submit the
application to multiple regulators. I know that I am speculating but LP may have
meant that it would be okay to send to the MHRA an MAA that only included the
manual method because that is adequate for the UK clientele but it would be especially
important to include EDEN in the submission since that methodology can be easily
utilized to serve the many more patients in other jurisdictions.


[quoteThe Company strongly believes that after so many years of work on the DCVax-L program, taking some additional time to help ensure that the full MAA package is as strong as it can be is especially important since the Company plans to submit applications to multiple regulators. ][/quote]
Bullish
Bullish