Replies to post #334798 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[2can$]

You can say that again, I'll get it....







The intent is to post information that is true and accurate about DBMM and make sure anyone reading the board has that information. If an investor (not just a "novice" investor but ANY investor) that is thinking of opening a new position in DBMM sees that information, and it causes him/her to do MORE research into DBMM? That is the intent.



So what about when you said that DBMM will be revoked by SEC judge in November 2019? Or the commissioners were working hard to overturn the judges decision? Or that the 211 and CE removal won't happen until OIP is dismissed? Or that OIP will go on indefinitely? Was that all "true and accurate" information?

Also why the 5 year posting hiatus from 2014 to 2019? The bulk of you posts here are at a time when DBMM wasn't even purchasable by traders. Also it contradicts what you stated here:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173111157

"Has nothing to do with it. I started posting again because I happened to look in on the board and saw that Pink was unrealistically pumping this POS. When I started pointing out the reality of DBMM's situation, he started attacking me for it. So I went on from there. If you look at the posts, you'll see that's true. But whatever."

So did you start posting again to give new investors accurate information or because Pink was pumping and attacking you? And how would Pink be pumping when this was 2 years after suspension and stock was illiquid and had trading restrictions? There are a ton of contradictions and things that don't make any sense in this story you are trying to tell. And not to mention everything Pink said about DBMM winning the case and returning back to normal trading was accurate, you turned out to be wrong.

👍️ 0 🇧🇷 1 🇨🇨 1

[Jetmek_03052]

LOL!

And not to mention everything Pink said about DBMM winning the case and returning back to normal trading

Absolute TRASH.

This was not about Pink saying DBMM would be "returning to normal trading" - although I did say I didn't think it would happen until the OIP was dropped

This was about Pink saying how wonderful this company was, how it would "soon" zoom up to dollars a share and make everyone MILLION AIRES. Invariably, most of his posts stated how great DBMM was doing, how wonderful Linda Perry was, how few shares were in the OS, how DBMM was one of the few OTC companies that had actual income (but never mentioning it was losing money EVERY QUARTER).....all sorts of false information about how great an "investment" he thought DBMM was.

So I decided to stick around and make sure BOTH sides of the story were told. The PUMPERS fluffy and unrealistic side....and the factual and truthful information about DBMM.

And how would Pink be pumping when this was 2 years after suspension and stock was illiquid and had trading restrictions?

There were trading "restrictions" but it could still trade. Just not as a regular pink issue. If you doubt it, look up your pal PennyPauly's favorite exaggerations in his posts.

DBMM had the CE restriction put on 05/17/15 I believe, and it came off on 12/20/22. Yet here's some of the numbers of shares that Penny stated were traded in some of those years:

2015 1,327,000,000

2016 2,938,000,000

2017 1,980,000,000

2018 205,000,000

2019 429,000,000

2020 202,000,000

2021 194,000,000

If you hold those as true? Then I'd say Pink was doing a pretty good job of pumping!

And I didn't hardly post at all from about 2014 until about 2019. I only started posting in earnest again until after that.

But at any rate? At the end of all this discussion? I do not have to justify ANYTHING to you! I can post ANYTIME and ANYWHERE I want. And the reasons I posted have been stated and are true, although I do not even have to give THAT explanation.

You listened to the pied pipers of the board, and now you're stuck between a rock and a hard place. You've only yourself to blame.