InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 3365
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/04/2020

Re: Jetmek_03052 post# 334789

Saturday, 01/13/2024 1:38:08 PM

Saturday, January 13, 2024 1:38:08 PM

Post# of 344177

The intent is to post information that is true and accurate about DBMM and make sure anyone reading the board has that information. If an investor (not just a "novice" investor but ANY investor) that is thinking of opening a new position in DBMM sees that information, and it causes him/her to do MORE research into DBMM? That is the intent.



So what about when you said that DBMM will be revoked by SEC judge in November 2019? Or the commissioners were working hard to overturn the judges decision? Or that the 211 and CE removal won't happen until OIP is dismissed? Or that OIP will go on indefinitely? Was that all "true and accurate" information?

Also why the 5 year posting hiatus from 2014 to 2019? The bulk of you posts here are at a time when DBMM wasn't even purchasable by traders. Also it contradicts what you stated here:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173111157

"Has nothing to do with it. I started posting again because I happened to look in on the board and saw that Pink was unrealistically pumping this POS. When I started pointing out the reality of DBMM's situation, he started attacking me for it. So I went on from there. If you look at the posts, you'll see that's true. But whatever."

So did you start posting again to give new investors accurate information or because Pink was pumping and attacking you? And how would Pink be pumping when this was 2 years after suspension and stock was illiquid and had trading restrictions? There are a ton of contradictions and things that don't make any sense in this story you are trying to tell. And not to mention everything Pink said about DBMM winning the case and returning back to normal trading was accurate, you turned out to be wrong.