What someone does or doesn't do and what they're legally entitled to do or not do are not mutually inclusive. Same goes for what a legal document says compared to what a legal document was INTENDED to do. A mistake of law is a real thing. That's why parties can come together and seek modification of legal documents in the event of a "mutual mistake" or other similar factual scenario like in the Shover Suit. Seems you think otherwise, JT. IMO, your way of thinking is extremely ignorant and unsophisticated. It ignores all aspects of common law jurisprudence.
From my personal experience, I know sometimes people do things they're not entitled to do, or don't do things they are required to do. That's why most, if not all jurisdictions in this country, have processes and proceedings to secure what's called an injunction, inclusive of specific performance.
Ergo, if you think NSI is doing what they are allowed to do, then I guess there's no problem. If you think NSI is doing something they aren't allowed to do (like me), then there are means and methods to do something about it. IMO, each and every NSI shareholder has their own reasons why they haven't done something about it yet.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
