Replies to post #4593 on Insmed Inc (INSM)

[Do DD]

Recurveman,

If the reasons of the reschedule were not SEC sensitive most probably a comment regarding the cause of the stipulation would have been easily obtainable from the INSM or TRCA/DNA lawyers. However, according to the NYT article both parties stated: no comment regarding the cause of the hearing delay. Therefore the reason of the stipulation is assumed to be SEC sensitive info.
Thus speculation concerning settlement/merger/whatever talks going on.

E.

[cashquest2003]

I must agree with Recurveman,

Too many opinions are toss about and the result is opinions begin to sound like likely outcomes. Remember during the trial, how many longs gave the opinion that an injunction was off the table, an out of the question thing. It took on a life of its own and became a forgone conclusion that even if we lost worse case 15% and no injunction, no way. What a bunch of faloopy that all was.

He is right this is all still up in the air and no conclusion can be drawn by the delay. The 12 million share day a few back, that's interesting. Exactly what was it, hard to say. The Ny times article, possible Eu approval, possible Eu partner, possibility of the delay meaning something. All very hard to see or say and be sure.

I for one am in and a holding. If this goes well and we hit $2, I'm out. It's been 3 years, and it still ain't gone to the moon, and Alice, I'm afraid this one is just another of my hair brain scheems and big dreaming.

Still holding, but haggered,

Cashquest