I'm not sure how relevant this is but it occurred to me while I was reading that the foundational nature of this Purchase and Assumption Agreement has been the primary public facing operating agreement on which the bank reorganization moved forward. HOWEVER, ALL PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT HAD, AND STILL HAVE, MAJOR LEGAL BEEFS WITH IT.
From what I gathered I think it was breached very early on because there were questions that JPMorgan Chase wanted to sue about.
There were suits and counter suits having nothing to do with LIBOR at all. We are still arguing about it in the courts and on the boards. I just think that that's an important aspect of the reality because people say, read the paperwork, well we're still arguing about it.