InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bizreader

10/18/23 9:20 PM

#717686 RE: ron_66271 #717685

Ok!
icon url

sidedraft

10/18/23 9:52 PM

#717688 RE: ron_66271 #717685

Does this:

Series R; +4.6X.

mean, that you believe, that Series R holders, should see $4,600 per share, for their $1,000 shares?
icon url

Bizreader

10/19/23 5:34 PM

#717711 RE: ron_66271 #717685

"Legacy WMI common equity is the FDIC claim holder because the commons owns the parent corporation." This edit makes sense to me.
Further knowing that the FDIC won't close out until distribution I then find a incentive for distribution which I felt was missing.
icon url

LuckyPanda

10/19/23 8:25 PM

#717718 RE: ron_66271 #717685

Ron, my concern is that the assets isolated and protected under remote bankruptcy may loose their shielding from FDIC-R clawback claims. Hence it cannot dostribute until FDIC R closes.

Also, FDIC may be delaying to close down the receivership with all these lawsuits for pennies because its waiting for the remote bankruptcy assets to be released so that it can file clawback claims of $13B for the WMB bonds.
icon url

LuckyPanda

11/12/23 5:18 PM

#718842 RE: ron_66271 #717685

Ron, the FDIC does not control the assets in remote bk...that's why they are 'remote'. However, I have a feeling that FDIC can sue those assets if they apppear before the receivership closes...Hence, that's why we havent seen any remote bk assets return even though it has been over a year since the bk closed.

FDIC does not "control" remote bk assets. but they can sue the assets if they emerge. They can sue for anything...no justifiable cause needed. They'll just sue to delay the asset return to us until we agree to share the assets to pay off the $13B WMB bonds. IMO