Can the 10Q discuss and/or document anything that occurs after June 30th (end of 2nd qtr)? If no, then "timeline door" remains open for a lot of speculation and/or interpreration on what may or may not have occurred since June 30th (yes/no)?
DJPele- difficulty getting past your first paragraph. Not an attorney but nwbo is disclosing material events. We can’t assume they submitted months ago when the last 10Q in plain English says Advent hadn’t completed their portion of the MAA.
Yes and yes but NWBO gets to use a special definition of ‘fiduciary duty’ much like it is allowed to use a special s definition of ‘1 yard line’ and ‘coming months.’ Since they’re lawyers it’s 109% legal but of course still wrong since again they’re lawyers.
NWBO shareholders have been smacked in the face by management so often they can’t smell that something is rotten in Bethesda.