It is truly scary to me that anyone thinks this. I really hope this isn't the majority view.
I post because I want to discuss the stock, not because I think my post will somehow influence someone to buy or sell. I don't have that kind of power, this forum doesn't have that kind of power.
Anyone that posts only because they think it is making them money needs to go start writing book reviews or something. You can actually make money doing those! Posting to a forum isn't making you anything.
I'm actually gonna disagree with that!! Well, perhaps "PUMPER'S" might but not all "BASHER'S" do (nor those who simply want to convey information to a MB).
For starters, what about this and similar posts about those who don't own shares?
So many times I've read that a basher has no shares. Well, if that is the case then how is he/her they/them posting "because they want to make money"? (And, NO, I do NOT believe in "paid basher's" nor basher's being "shorter's" so no need to go there).
There are actually MANY reasons why a person might bash (complain, etc.) about a ticker/CEO:
Well, afaic, George Sharp "bashes" other tickers/CEOs (enough so as to have his own "ShitList" of them). Is GS an "a-hole" for doing it? And what about the posts when some "Revenge Pumper/Basher"(?) actually goes to another ticker and bash for the, seemingly, sole purpose of getting "revenge" on another poster because that poster might have pissed them off here? So they seek out tickers that person has posted to and/or is invested in and BASH it, but all the while, seemingly, not giving a damn about all the OTHER shareholders invested there. Also "a-holes"??
So is "complaining about an UNDER-PERFORMING ticker (Bashing, right?) always a bad thing and done "because they want to make money"? What about Sharp's tweets? .
And what if someone ACTUALLY beleives a ticker is a "scam"? What does GS say about that?
And what about these folks? "Good Samaritans"? Where do they fit in?
Okay, their ultimate motive might be "because they want to make money" but they don't have to post at all but, imo, when they do isn't it mainly just to convey information they might have found and, thus, to warn investors about a possible scam? Hey, sort of like what GS does!! (Hmmm, didn't GS used to work with some of them folks??)
Certainly some of the basher's were correct in warning folks about them, no? And, imo, not all of the basher's were shareholders of them either so, imo, they couldn't have posted "because they want to make money", right? Must have been another reason for their posts.