Replies to post #65811 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[ARobinson]

Everyone should read this because it's the most accurate assessment of what is going on. The public - and I suspect Calasse and his lawyers - have turned this into some kind of video game where they think they are going to win something or hurt George. Neither will happen.

If they win the lawsuit, WNFT never merges with anything and they have a bunch of angry shareholders pissed at them for blocking a merger (and potentially a B of FD lawsuit to contend with).

If they lose the lawsuit, WNFT merges with something and they get nothing.

In my opinion, George does not give a shit about WNFT with Calasse attached. He will simply shrug and merge one or all three of his other tickers and blame Calasse for messing things up.

[FEARANDGREED]

I laid out this possible scenario weeks ago. Personally, I don't think that the PPS has tanked enough for Calasse yet (to intentionally default or straight up pull the appeal) -ie- the PPS damage that could be inflicted by continuing to milk this. ....Looks like we will find out soon enough as far as the "default" scenario is concerned.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171942469

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171930217


And by the way, I seriously doubt that Calasse has spent a nickle on this appeal ...99% of the time, these types of cases are taken on a contingency basis.

Sharp on the other hand has most likely spent a significant chunk.

On a secondary note.... Anyone know anything about the separate breach of fiduciary duty case that Sharp tossed at Calasse?

[Yolo]

There are some major assumptions included in this post.

The NVSC did not indicate anything about the lawsuit being frivolous or non frivolous, the only thing we can say is that they didn't dismiss. I'm not sure why you think any of it is absurd, myself.

And not naming someone a party isn't a "technicality," it's a mandatory part of the legal process. By not naming him a party, the court never had authority over him or to cancel his shares.

That's key to why I expect it to be reversed.

The NVSC DID see the lawsuit as frivolous and chose not to rule on it for its high level of absurdity. Rather than rule, they are placing every obstacle possible to force both parties to settle their differences. The technicality of naming a party versus the history of GOFF's mismanagement lacked connection and relevance.