InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1385
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2023

Re: I-Glow post# 65810

Monday, 07/24/2023 11:33:23 AM

Monday, July 24, 2023 11:33:23 AM

Post# of 69164
The NVSC DID see the lawsuit as frivolous and chose not to rule on it for its high level of absurdity. Rather than rule, they are placing every obstacle possible to force both parties to settle their differences. The technicality of naming a party versus the history of GOFF's mismanagement lacked connection and relevance.

This case will either be terminated by Callesse or allowed to continue indefinitely until one or both parties decide it's just not worth the legal fees. It reminds me of a bitter divorce, where the lawyers keep issuing restraining orders to the other party for big and bigger fees.

In my opinion, the loser in all this will be Callesse, since GS has 3 other tickers to merge. If Cal's team was smart, they would be buying up as many shares as possible at these prices prior to allowing the legal response deadline to expire. If they continue, they will have more legal fees to contend with along with a HUGE opportunity cost to digest.

Unless they are in the business of wasting each other's time and money... because if it has to do with harming GS, that ship is about to sail with 3 other mergers pending.