InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 7687
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2010

Re: MrSmith18 post# 65811

Monday, 07/24/2023 12:28:01 PM

Monday, July 24, 2023 12:28:01 PM

Post# of 69837
I laid out this possible scenario weeks ago. Personally, I don't think that the PPS has tanked enough for Calasse yet (to intentionally default or straight up pull the appeal) -ie- the PPS damage that could be inflicted by continuing to milk this. ....Looks like we will find out soon enough as far as the "default" scenario is concerned.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171942469

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171930217


And by the way, I seriously doubt that Calasse has spent a nickle on this appeal ...99% of the time, these types of cases are taken on a contingency basis.

Sharp on the other hand has most likely spent a significant chunk.

On a secondary note.... Anyone know anything about the separate breach of fiduciary duty case that Sharp tossed at Calasse?

This guy walks up to me at the horse track... As I placed my bet he scoffed at my pick. ....Then offered to by my ticket for half price..