InvestorsHub Logo

kabunushi

06/20/23 12:19 AM

#602913 RE: Ambassador4Life #602912

Thanks, but the link leads to an article about glioma radiology. I see no apparent connection or reference to dc-vax anywhere in the article. Did you link to the wrong article? If not, please give me a page number that references dc-vax because I don't see that anywhere in a quick scan of this article on your link. This is your article (none of the authors are associated with dc-vax trials afaik).

Radiomics for characterization of the glioma immune microenvironment
Nastaran Khalili, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Ariana Familiar, Debanjan Haldar, Adam Kraya, Jessica Foster, Mateusz Koptyra, Phillip B. Storm, Adam C. Resnick & Ali Nabavizadeh

mike00h

06/20/23 7:17 AM

#602938 RE: Ambassador4Life #602912

I'll take it , but...
The nature article mentions DCVax two times and lists a reference to a 2015 article. No mention of the JAMA article.
Not exactly great news, but positive, at least.

FeMike

06/20/23 7:36 AM

#602942 RE: Ambassador4Life #602912

Congrats Longs - Nature Published DCVAX article



Calling this a 'DCVax article' is about in line with calling the movie "Men in Black" a 'sports' movie because one of the scenes showed a baseball game.