InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Arby2000

06/01/23 8:25 AM

#597449 RE: The Danish Dude #597442

I wonder if someone encouraged Hiltzim to slightly edit and republish his old article?
icon url

HappyLibrarian

06/01/23 8:45 AM

#597454 RE: The Danish Dude #597442

You are right to call out lazy, sloppy and misleading journalism in this article.

However, those handling public relations at NWBO have had a decade to figure out that journalism has changed and that if one does not engage with journalists and make it easy for them to put one’s perspective in the story, this is what one gets.

Some shareholders turned against NWBO management years ago due to their withdrawal in the area of public relations and the ensuing damage to the share price which it predictably caused. While the involvement of Neil Woodford and the hopes held out for TLD etc. in 2020 leasing up TLD release provided brief respites, one can see the overall share price issues created by NWBO’s failure to understand how to deal effectively with the news media as it is and not as everyone might like it to be.
icon url

abc1212

06/01/23 9:19 AM

#597470 RE: The Danish Dude #597442

Well done Danish on ripping that LA Times journalist a new one
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

ilovetech

06/01/23 9:58 AM

#597479 RE: The Danish Dude #597442

Danish - EXCELLENT WORK!!
icon url

ilovetech

06/01/23 10:01 AM

#597482 RE: The Danish Dude #597442

Danish - I would recommend CC:ING the the thread or hashtagging Cohen Milstein.

ILT
icon url

Doc logic

06/01/23 10:07 AM

#597486 RE: The Danish Dude #597442

The Danish Dude,

Great summary!; ). Now if I were to speculate I would say that many so called news outlets are really just paid shelf space like the supermarkets have developed into over the years. NWBO doesn’t pay for any space so their story does not get told.
For the most part news today in the US by major outlets is wrapped in entertainment, intertwined with about 40% air time commercials and wrapped up in an underlying agenda that demonstrates clear bias about how viewpoints are presented and expected to be perceived. These considerations as much as anything explain the bought and paid for ads against NWBO. Negative ad campaigns like the one you have written about are more subtle and are designed simply to get potential investors from looking more deeply into a potential opportunity. They are obviously pounded out trying desperately to paint a bad picture of an opponent during election cycles when no one can miss them because of all the money spent on them. Best wishes.