Replies to post #414260 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[bas2020]

Missling knows he's dealing with criminals who are allowed to bash, short and distort every bit of good confirmatory data. He doesn't stoop to their level and feed the crime machine. Nope, he instead stays on higher ground, while he continues to deliver one successful trial after another... and prepares for approvals and commercialization.

FUDsters will be FUDsters. It's what they're paid to do by the HFs in support of their criminal SP manipulative activities.

[tredenwater2]

So because some loser writes hit pieces, Anavex's reaction is to just take their ball and go home?

No they are playing “ball” in the AU and European league to showcase their talents.

[Gator328]

Not all battles are fought publicly. Most are not.

And who exactly is the "enemy" to continue with the war parlance?

Hint: it's not Adam Feuerstein.

It's the wall that exists between the FDA and approval. The enemy is convincing the skeptics on the FDA panel to vote for approval. And as long as Dr. Missling is conversing with the FDA and understands what they're looking for, he's on the right path.

Engaging in public stunts with hack journalists will help the price short-term but it'll also attract a lot more time and attention away from the goal. What's the end-game, to get them to stop posting nonsense? It's their right to be skeptical, as long as what they write is based on their understanding of the truth and not knowingly meant to spread falsities. That second part makes libel and slander so difficult, especially when someone isn't a public figure (and I doubt AF would qualify).

The moment our CEO starts responding to stupid people on the internet is the moment I will become concerned about my AVXL investment. That's a response tactic someone who doesn't have any other cards to play starts to do. If Anavex has a successful drug, and I believe it does, our CEO doesn't need to worry about what anyone else has to say.

[BIOChecker4]

You are correct!

Even if there are stock manipulators at work, (unproven in court so far), Missling should be treating investor communications, as well as media communications, as a very high priority. And I agree he should also doing much more to be fully prepared for any comments or criticisms coming his way and to be proactive. Unfortunately, communicating with investors seems to be little more than an afterthought and an annoyance.

One effect of poor communications is a discount to the fair value of the stock, and with Missling periodically putting shares to LPC in order to raise cash, that means it’s costing shareholders in the form of more dilution that it should be. Of course, there are shareholders here who don’t seem to mind being on the losing end of excess dilution but that’s nothing new.