InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PlutoniumImplosion07

04/01/23 6:25 PM

#96961 RE: IPwatcher #96960

Every new tealeaf was a choice. He chose to try to make his most loyal investors feel that their reluctance to pursue his personal interests more aggressively (by among other things, doxing good samaritans) was one of the reasons it wasn't coming to market. He could have been earning an income to pay them back a small percentage of their losses so they could get closure. He could have just left them alone. Renewing the scam with the Pedima nonsense knowing people were being scammed anew made it impossible to stand idly by.
icon url

PlutoniumImplosion07

04/01/23 10:37 PM

#96962 RE: IPwatcher #96960

And yeah, you called it from the get go but your posts didn't get the attention they needed to. Everyone should have been copying and pasting your research instead of just poking fun. Did he ever directly respond to it beyond doding the question? He demanded proof for so long but doesn't seem to have responded to crystal clear proof.

I'm not sure if the shareholders realize it was never about wanting to see the stock price go down but the outrageousness of the scam that motivated almost every "basher" to post. Once he lost control of the message boards and his followers began to see the light, he resorted to trying to rip off investment banks.
icon url

diarch

04/06/23 8:29 AM

#96966 RE: IPwatcher #96960

Your well-documented narrative of Berbaby’s shenanigans & misrepresentations prompted a parallel with Elizabeth Holmes-sans the bogus sophisticated equipment and high profile backers and money-class investors. And as well publicized, she’s up for 11.