InvestorsHub Logo

xoom

03/12/23 4:20 PM

#706014 RE: ron_66271 #706009

Ron, Interesting you say that because GovInsider on BP felt AZ’s XXXX ‘could be’ SIVB.
That or JPMC or Fortress !!
FWIW
GLTA

lodas

03/12/23 4:27 PM

#706015 RE: ron_66271 #706009

Dreaming again ron?.....is this a new concoction to replace the 5885 AT, wilful misconduct charges against JPM, etc.?....the difference between a " good dream, and a bad dream" is sweating....please stay with your old assumptions, and forget the dreaming.....Lodas

BBANBOB

03/12/23 4:41 PM

#706018 RE: ron_66271 #706009

THIS GROUP WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH BEING A BANK EVER AGAIN IMHO

UpTickMeA$AP

03/12/23 5:18 PM

#706022 RE: ron_66271 #706009

This is a joke, right?

My goodness!!! Please!! Tell me this is an attempt at humor!!!

Wow!

ron_66271

03/12/23 5:42 PM

#706025 RE: ron_66271 #706009

It’s Best if All Depositors Are Made Full.

Otherwise depositors with over $250K in their accounts need make withdrawals to other banks to protect their businesses cash flow.

Bidding over the weekend for “National Bank of Santa Clara (SVB).
JPM is already too big!

BOD of SVB needs to be prosecuted.

Good read;
https://www.theepochtimes.com/finance-sector-braces-for-shockwaves-after-silicon-valley-bank-collapse_5115599.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp

PickStocks

03/12/23 7:20 PM

#706041 RE: ron_66271 #706009

You have broke the riddle…..AZ’s riddle…..SIVB is XXXX….. one failed bank for another…….

Bizreader

03/12/23 8:06 PM

#706047 RE: ron_66271 #706009

Brainy stuff.