InvestorsHub Logo

th6565

02/20/23 3:16 PM

#133291 RE: jimjet218 #133290

You must remember in 2010 who was CEO then? My counting stated in 2017.

Reanimator

02/20/23 3:22 PM

#133293 RE: jimjet218 #133290

LWLG has had, and continues to have, a huge credibility problem. Anyone who suggests LWLG management doesn't have a credibility problem is basically saying that up is down and down is up.

Nrdc92

02/21/23 2:28 AM

#133325 RE: jimjet218 #133290

That is painful to read; but history is relevant, and it’s a reminder that hyperbole has been flowing from management for decades, with nothing but PowerPoint slides to show for it. At this point, the only way management obtains any credibility is to ink a commercially relevant deal. I’ll go out on a limb and predict that that will not happen in 2023, given the absurd lack of direct communication with shareholders and the continued floundering of the trading volume and share price. What a mess.

prototype_101

02/21/23 6:50 AM

#133327 RE: jimjet218 #133290

LWLG was a materials only company back then, they had not yet even achieved consistent "purity" of their materials, the turnaround times were abysmal with the Uni's and the LSS, Lockeed's etc, not until about 2014 when Joe Miller got the company to take device development in-house did this technology become the success that Lebby has in-hand today!

For 40 years the Industry has tried unsuccessfully! >>

IBM, Lockheed Martin, DuPont, AT&T Bell Labs, Honeywell, Motorola, HP, 3M, and others in addition to numerous universities and U.S. Government Agencies, have attempted to produce high-performance, high-stability electro-optic polymers <<<< literally in the Billions R&D $$ were spent to try to do what LWLG has done!

So LWLG's technology has been successfully developed in much less time than what the Industry spent, and at a cost less than 5% of what the Industry spent screwing around with unstable fragile molecules for 40 years!

Electro-Optic Polymer Production – Our Approach vs. the BLA Approach

LWLG's P2IC Platform is cheaper ($1/Gb) & better (lower power 1v) & scalable (100Gbs to 400Gbs to 800Gbs and beyond!)

Brief polymer history…

• <1980s

– Strong government funding for non-linear electro-optic organic
polymers (DARPA, NSF, DOE, DoD etc.)
– Many papers, reports, books

• 1980s – 2000s
– Heavy, focused, and increased gvt funding for non-linear EO organic
polymers (DARPA, NSF, DOE, DoD, USAirForce, USNavy, USArmy, EU)
– Industry R&D lab funding e.g. Du Pont, Dow, Akzo Nobel, IBM, Intel,
Boeing, Motorola, AT&T Bell Labs, GE, Lockheed etc.
– Increase in papers, publications, conferences, and books

• 2000s – 2010s
– Wane in government funding and industrial R&D lab activity
– Limited commercialization in fiber based communications

• >2010s
– Excellent progress on high speed performance (>100Gbaud)
– Resurgence?

LWLG inventor Fred Goetz took an opposite approach, he started with something inherently STABILE, a plastic, and worked to make it E/O active, the result was a 3rd generation Polymer that is LWLG

Read below to understand why LWLG has succeeded now, and YES they have succeeded, just need to be accepted and this rocket will launch !!

Paradox of Electro-Optics


Certain materials are made of robust molecules and their electrons are so strongly bound in the molecular structure that it is difficult for them to vibrate or breakaway.

Such materials may be robust but generally their electrons do not vibrate easily. By analogy, a beer-mug may be thick -walled but it would be much more difficult for our soprano to vibrate it with his or her voice.

This has been the dilemma of electro -optics. Creating a molecule in which an electron can oscillate freely back and forth when hit by light but which does not wildly vibrate the material toward its own resonant destruction.

Second-generation electro-optics are fragile like champagne flutes It was a daunting challenge. Scientists had been working on the problem since the 1960's and by the late -90's most everyone had deemed the task impossible, just as it is infeasible to merge the delicate vibration character of a champagne flute with a Hamburg beer stein.

Second-Generation


Second-generation electro-optic polymers are excellent high -
performance electron oscillators.Their long fluted shape however makes them highly unstable and unreliable.

Most scientists had been trying to make more slender and delicate "molecular flutes" that would vibrate easily, blindly hoping that they would somehow, someday figure out how to stabilize these molecular structures. This thin and delicate class of molecules has become known as second-generation electro-optic materials.

Third-Generation (LWLG)

Meanwhile, the scientists at LWLG continued quietly and
indefatigably toward the Holy Grail, the Fluted Stein. A molecule that was robust and yet which would vibrate more easily than the thinnest sliver of crystal. Once thought impossible,LWLG succeeded on their quest, producing today's third-generation of electro-optic molecules. LWLG scientists accomplished this by stabilizing the core of the molecule with interlocking atomic rings, much like crosshatches or the rungs of a ladder.

Third-generation electro-optic materials are even higher performing as electron oscillators. Their ring-locked shape gives them tremendous stability. Within these structures the electrons still vibrate easily, in fact they oscillate significantly better than within second -generation materials, yet they are incredibly robust due to their reinforced scaffold-like structure.
Bullish
Bullish