InvestorsHub Logo

Elcappy1

02/07/23 12:48 PM

#116012 RE: Musicman99 #116010

Yup, the merger candidate has been waiting for George to get everything in to position.

RAND

02/07/23 12:49 PM

#116013 RE: Musicman99 #116010

Agreed musicman

samsamsamiam

02/07/23 1:02 PM

#116023 RE: Musicman99 #116010

Oh I will agree George’s tweets will pretty much always be carefully worded so he can backpedal if things don’t work out.
It confirms nothing.
And of course he will try to merge something in here! That was the whole point of getting the custodianship!! He tells the courts it is some emergency because he has a pending potential merger ready to go. So let’s just see how long it takes.

The question will be the quality of the company and the past history will taint it.
And how big a reverse split will be needed.
If George just turns this into some holding company for a bunch of deals he is already involved with - it will be a “gentle” reverse split. As he will need to hang on his “believers” while he milks it dry.

Oh sorry - does that sound too skeptical?

Yolo

02/07/23 1:28 PM

#116034 RE: Musicman99 #116010

I don't think it proves anything either way.

If he had a candidate, he had to include the warnings to avoid liability and protect investors.

If he didn't have a candidate, that is the same exact tweet he would use to make people think he had a candidate.

It's still Schrödinger's cat at this point.