Replies to post #277998 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Renee]

I do hope you're right, JMMatthews. It isn't fair for me to now give odds on DBMM winning or losing on the PFR, but I have always been on the shareholders' side, even when it appears that I'm not. FWIW, had DBMM accepted revocation 5 years ago (as I suggested 5 years ago and ever since) the new FORM 10 to reregister would have allowed DBMM to trade unencumbered about 90 days after accepting revocation. No O.I.P. outstanding......no P.F.R. pending.....just normal trading. Refusing to do so is all on Linda Perry......not on anyone else.

The D.O.E. has been tenacious against 2,308 other companies. As we can see by the five 90 day extensions for the PFR it should be reasonable to think the D.O.E. is being just as tenacious against DBMM. That doesn't mean the D.O.E. will succeed.....it merely means the D.O.E. is still pursuing revocation.

I have no vested interest in DBMM losing the P.F.R. and I will gladly eat humble pie for DBMM to win.

Best o' luck, JMM!

[Harley16]

Absolutely zero are the odds!!! So the sec is
Going to over turn their own judge years later after the company had been fully reporting since and is now trading freely on the market? Without issue I might add !

Tell Me how that looks to current shareholders ? Is that in their best interest ? How about the new shareholders tht have bought in the last few months ?
Is that sec upholding their mandate to protect shareholders best interests ?

Absolutely zero chance.

Are they a threat to reoffend even? Good
Luck proving that after being a n grey and pink and still being fully reporting to
Sec standards.

If those 2300 other companies that got revoked were fully reporting they would be here with dbmm.
There is no Comparison!!!