InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DarthYoda

01/11/23 3:12 AM

#107719 RE: shajandr #107717

As much as this may have ended up being a scam, most of what you had to say wasn't correct. You just piled on with others here from the DD and Fraud board once the ship started to sink. The only thing those scams had in common with this one was the general concept of "chemical detection". Was there anything else in common?

Technically speaking, an e-nose can absolutely detect terpenes and the mydx device did do that. Did you know they kept submitting several flower profiles to their own system every day for years? The app is still downloadable from the android store, so they may still be doing that. They locked the guest login now though, so you would have to actually log into the app to find out. Realize how many minutes each sample submission takes, and then ask yourself why they would waste their time sitting around doing that. That data was never even presented to shareholders in any real detail at all, and they continued to submit the samples and data into the database even after the trading volume dried up here. They would only do that because there was/is value in that terpene data for some interested party. I don't think the DD and Fraud board will ever dig that deep though because only the smallest scams are worthy of attention.
icon url

DarthYoda

01/11/23 4:58 AM

#107722 RE: shajandr #107717

Ask yourselves why a Judge would keep approving repeated 3a exemptions when there was nothing unique happening here. There was no emergency other than Yazbeck claiming he was behind on some bills. Is that really enough for a judge to say "Ok, go ahead and violate rule 144"? "Just go ahead and borrow as much money as you desire and your financier can dump shares as immediately as they desire"? All because Daniel just asked? Why would a judge approve such nonsense requests? And multiple times? Come on. The battery that powered this scam was the JUDGE.