InvestorsHub Logo

theswordman

12/31/22 6:39 PM

#216347 RE: moneycrew #216346

For the most part--those folks were trying to protect their shares/investment. As we saw Dr Patterson took shares for payment then CYDY (nodder) would not corp seal them so not really worth anything. Saw basically the same thing w pestell ,where some (maybe you??) still believe nodder fired for cause and withheld shares. Sadly @ trial, when it was nodder time to present "for cause" evidence--he had none--ZERO.

I have never heard Dr Patterson talk bad about LL--he seems to believe strong in CCR5 antagonist. Was wanting to trial and 13D said they had funding?? Maybe they did. Not as much stretch to believe that as to believe Cyrus won't fire us has ANY trial funding beyond reverse split.

The whole nonsense about patents and gonna steal and buyout cheap--was just nonsense. Brought to you by same people that brought you amawrecks fantastic job--and RO testing--and BLA submitted--applied for EUA--ETC ETC ETC. Qilu partnerships --GSK partnerships--London vacations--and hanging posters and safe sex monkeys. Just the crew that gets subsidized for lies. Free shares for posting nonsense. Sure you know where to find them and which rabbit hole to go down. Can't figure it out?? Try kazempourhassan--skelly--weed/wine/micky mulholland etc etc etc

3X Charm

01/01/23 11:47 AM

#216358 RE: moneycrew #216346

I never said LL was saline…Ever.

I said Nader was a crook and I laid out the case and I was 100 percent correct. Had the BOD replaced him after the FDA smack down letter or the RTF, both of which were cause for removal, the drug may have had a chance for HIV.

I have been invested since 2012 and knew the original CEO and a former COB. Patterson and 13D wanted control because they saw the potential and realized Nader was inept and a crook. Nader totally wasted over $400m and he absolutely knew the data submitted to FDA was flawed.

Why did that idiot buy so much product from Samsung knowing approval was never coming? He had to know the CD 12 trial was under dosed, yet went ahead anyway. Why? Nader is corrupt and did everything for sole purpose of pumping the SP. PERIOD.

No action exhibited by Nader was for the focused purpose of bringing the drug to market and many other executives and BOD members had to know that. Me and others saw that years ago and called him out. Nader sycophants called us “shorties”. I Never shorted a stock, only wanted an honest, credentialed CEO, which is the opposite of Nader.

If one has the chops represented in law enforcement investigations, they would understand the extremely high probability of Nader being convicted after being indicted. That is why Federal investigations take so long. They are virtually guaranteed to get a conviction with a guilty plea and no trial most likely. The company will likely be fined/punished for complete lack of corporate governance, and internal conflicts of interest with the COB who reported to Nader in his day job. SMH.

On the other hand, someone we know, was a staunch supporter of Nader and has been completely inaccurate in all predictions.

that_little_voice

01/03/23 10:09 AM

#216377 RE: moneycrew #216346

They wanted the vehicle!

They wanted access to the investor base and license to print money for themselves.

Plain and simple!

All bears here called out Patterson for the money hungry snake oil salesman he was.13d were/are investors who were down big and wanted to recoup lost investments.