Another view point.
"Sure, it is up to OTCMarkets to make the decision about dropping the CE, but their decision is based on whether or not DBMM is a risky stock... which the ongoing SEC case is very relevant to!"
This is factual but only looking from certain angle. Who are you saving from DBMM by not dropping the CE? New investors? New investors that if any DD was done would see all the things you repeatedly detail here? You are not the only one talking about the failures within DBMM.
But by purposely trapping existing investors are you saving them? They were fed plenty of misinformation prior to being trapped in the debacle.
One could argue that by opening up trading it would allow those investors an exit point. I believe this would do far more good than harm. And if the many posts about zero interest in DBMM are correct, either it would be thinly traded or not at all. So from a different perspective appears withholding CE decision would possibly do more harm than good.
Of course, the facts are, once OTCM rules were changed here, giving them authority over this action. They would have to find definitive evidence to withhold CE removal. If the ALJ did not find this, FINRA did not find this and the Commission has a historical precedent of not overturning most ALJ decisions. My opinion is they likely open up trading and let the chips fall.
Plus, in case everyone forgot, MM's profit from DBMM trading. Regardless of whether or not investors do...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
